and this is why the times has become just another rag

Both USAT and NYT emphasize the military's position. "U.S. Hits Suspected Militants in Western Iraq," announces USAT. But what's interesting is that the Times, while weighting its story toward the military, is also the only paper with a Ramadi dateline. Given that the NYT quotes only a U.S. commander—and no Iraqis—TP suspects the reporter was traveling or embedded with the military. Nothing wrong with that. But if it's the case, the reporter should tell readers.

the new york times has lost her glory as a shining beacon of hope, truth, and the American way. she has become a whore to war, lies, and terror.