well, the debate wiped out bush's lead. 49-46 now on newsweek. it's october. you can be sure there will be some surprise this month.

why has nobody bothered to define the difference between a terrorist and insurgent? could it be that it would mark the end of a congame?

there's a new threat. just in time. kerry got the trophy today for last night's performance. this is like the 3rd time we've gotten threats from al-qaeda, and none of them have involved bin laden. why is nobody asking where he is.

they want you to be safe. we want you to be safe AND free.

a bulldozer could not keep up with the shit being forced down the American people's throats by cnn. judy woofwoof is trying her best, but the desperation is taking a serious toll on her. the wrinkles are starting to get deeper.

Challenged about his views on sexual morality, Justice Scalia surprised his audience at Harvard University, telling them: "I even take the position that sexual orgies eliminate social tensions and ought to be encouraged."

*giggle*
gives a whole new meaning to the 5-4 decision.

well, john, you disappointed me. i expected more hammering. i expected you to put george on the defensive. it almost appears as if you were unprepared. i sure hope the next debate takes on a more stand-up-and-say-we're-not-gonna-take-it-anymore tone.

here we go folx.

note to candi crowley: you overweight twit. how in the hell can you say with a straight face (actually there's nothing straight about your mug) that what john kerry has to do tonite is to decide how his plan is different than 'president' bush's ...
when bush hasn't got a plan to be different from.

cnn, you are sooooo busted. playing volume and crowd tricks with the camera is indeed sneaky, deceptive, and evil.

are you really glad you sold your collective souls to the darkside?

putt putt putt ... the schooichildren are doing their homework, while they're watching a video, and probably streaming some shoutcast at the same time. there's gotta be a better way on this distribution plan. nobody's wanting to say what the limit is on these nodes. but its safe to say, uptown and downtown, are two different scenarios.

anyway, what was i going to write about now. dammit. i think i had some suggestion again for kerry. he seeems to be hiding from them since he'd have broken out of that 'save me' shell already. c'mon now, it's been what? 5 months?

plenty of time. this first debate, if you can call it that, but the event tomorrow, getting contracted to fox for excusive camera coverage. surprise. lesson 1; who can out smart who here.

the pages are 35 of rules and sometimes the desires, of each campiagn, but i suspect taht it was more pushing on the bush side, then there was on the kerry side.

i wish these people would get it: your liberal base is not going to piss all over you like pissed off republicons who just saw the truth on a blog when you fire back with a one-two punch. forget the three-four-five followup/interjections and other such frivioty. it alienates the people you need to reach toniite/tomorrow nite.

and they can be. how? by pointing to honest. honest people make mistakes. evil people make mistakes. there has got to be a difference of mistakes. what the people want to hear, and i say like 5 workds, just how are those mistakes going to be dealt with.

with honesty. with truthfulness. for the people.
equate those assets and you will win.
'

the problem with the right (er, reich) wing is that everything to them is right-wing, left-wing. good and evil. black and white.

there's no color in them.

and that's sad. God is a rainbow.

kerry needs to get short
and direct.

the less words, the better. America has been dumbified too much for all this mind-speak right away.

john, if ya can hear us: tell us you respect us. your yadda yadda will only be qualified by your respect.

message to john kerry: STOP BEING SO DEFENSIVE, AND GET ON THE OFFENSE. you've got plenty of ammunition, dammit, so use it.

why hasn't anybody taken a step back and look at the words they're reading? fighting "anti-American" forces "in Iraq" should make everybody cringe with contempt.

This site contains a hyperlinked index of the people, places, and organizations cited in the 9/11 Commission Report. This site has been made freely available to the public for the purpose of aiding readers in locating specific information found in the report. This index was generated by InFact™, a relationship extraction product created by Insightful Corporation (NASDAQ:IFUL), a leading provider of software solutions for analysis of numeric and text data. For further information please contact InFact@insightful.com or call Kim Kok at 1-800-569-0123 x279 (1-703-356-5169).

oh goodie, American Dreams is back! J.J.'s mother saying that she is supporting her son in response to her daughter-in-law's assertion that she's not supporting the war, made me realize something: if you really supported the troops, wouldn't you want them home instead of fighting an unwinnable war?

guests on these sunday morning talk shows need to do something American - tell their hosts: "That's stimply not true"

if you listen to all the reasons why people support bush, you begin to notice something wicked. they all believe in lies. they believe bush never changes his mind. they believe that bush doesn't need world support to engage in a war.

don't they read the newspapers? or watch the television? maybe they do, because newspapers and television is clearly in bush's corner.

tim russert, you're BUSTED big boy.

general abizaid was reading a script. clear as day. anybody watching could see it. how you think you could get away with this deceptive tactic, especially after the right-wingers were screaming for rather's head, is beyond me.

but suffice it to say, it was a blog that started rathergate, and it'll be a blog that starts russertgate.