Saturday, July 23, 2005

PLAMEGATE and the men who brought it to you

and covered by one of the best, most accurate "reporters" of our time, this story has legs i never would have put on her. soupy is exactly how this lying and thievin (mis)administration would like for it to get, so nobody will ever know the truth, except those who are trying to convict America because of it.

josh marshall, you have my extreme gratitude for allowing us to see the truth.

Ever wonder why George Tenet's July 11, 2003 mea culpa about the Niger uranium snafu seemed so protective of the White House?

Maybe that was because it was written by Karl Rove and Scooter Libby.

Unless I'm mistaken this is one of several interesting (if not that surprising) tidbits in the Friday Times article on the Plame investigation. Says the Times ...

"Karl Rove and I. Lewis Libby Jr., were helping to prepare what became the administration's primary response to criticism that a flawed phrase about the nuclear materials in Africa had been included in Mr. Bush's State of the Union address six months earlier. They had exchanged e-mail correspondence and drafts of a proposed statement by George Tenet, then the director of central intelligence, to explain how the disputed wording had gotten into the address. Mr. Rove, the president's political strategist, and Mr. Libby, the chief of staff for Vice President Dick Cheney, coordinated their efforts with Stephen Hadley, then the deputy national security adviser, who was in turn consulting with Mr. Tenet."

This tells us a few things.

One, the seamless (or perhaps 'seamy', take your pick) integration of the political and national security staffs at the White House in organizing the push back against Joe Wilson and the controversy he'd ignited about the White House's use of phoney intelligence about an Iraqi nuclear weapons program.

Read the whole article and you'll see that these two were working together on this with a number of top White House officials.

Two, these were the two men who we know had conversations with reporters about Joe Wilson's wife, Valerie Plame. And it would seem that in the days leading up to the leak they were involved in active and detailed collaboration and/or dialog with Director Tenet about the Niger matter and the origins of Wilson's trip.

Another piece of the puzzle is suggested by a new article out from Bloomberg, which says that Rove's and Libby's testimony before the grand jury conflicts with testimony from the reporters whom they spoke to. Specifically, Libby reportedly told the grand jury that he heard of Plame's identity from Tim Russert. But Russert told the grand jury that that's not so.

Now, I know we've got a few balls in the air already. But let me note one other point.

A few days ago a former high-level administration official who was on Air Force One going to Africa with the president (and think for a moment how many now-former administration officials were on that flight in a position to vouch for this fact) told Bloomberg News that he saw Ari Fleischer "perusing the State Department memo on Wilson and his wife."

So Perhaps Libby and Rove found out about Plame from Fleischer, who would have been calling back to the White House. Or perhaps they got it from their research and authorship of the Tenet mea culpa. It seems quite conceiveable that they got it from both directions. Remember, Libby would have had no shortage of access to former CIA officers and CIA personnel on loan to the administration who could have given him more backstory on Plame. The two channels might even help explain the two versions of her name that were in circulation.

In any case, there was no shortage of channels through which they might have gotten the information. But each, it seems, in his grand jury testimony, has claimed he learned the information from journalists -- even though the journalists disagree.


Letter Of The Day

The Register published July 10 an article about the lack of adequate mental-health care ("State of Mental Anguish"). Now, in a July 14 editorial, the Register advocates shutting down the veterans health-care system, issuing cards to veterans and throwing them into the private sector ("Vets' Health Care Needs Overhaul").

Where in this system are they going to find treatment for the post-traumatic stress syndrome the Register admits may affect 30 percent of the soldiers returning from Iraq and/or Afghanistan? Is the private sector going to work hard to find shelter for homeless veterans, offer addiction treatment, run outpatient clinics, assist with drug costs?

Yes, veterans are "only one segment of the population," but they deserve treatment geared to their special needs. The veterans' health system does an admirable job striving to meet those needs. The private-hospital sector leaves much to be desired.

Don't do this to our veterans. If we can spend "precious public dollars" sending them to war, we should come up with the money to care for those who make it back.
-Markoline Johnson,
Des Moines.

--attribution

PLAMEGATE timeline

HERE

Friday, July 22, 2005

WHAT ARE THEY HIDING??

On July 22, the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) denounced the latest efforts of the Bush Administration to block the release of the Darby photos and videos depicting torture at Iraq’s Abu Ghraib prison facility. On June 2, 2004, CCR, along with the ACLU, Physicians for Human Rights, Veterans for Common Sense, and Veterans for Peace filed papers with the U.S. District Court, charging the Department of Defense and other government agencies with illegally withholding records concerning the abuse of detainees in American military custody. Since then, the organizations have been repeatedly rebuffed in their efforts to investigate what happened at the prison.

--source

Thursday, July 21, 2005

thieves stick together like bees on honey, don't they?

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. -- During the tumultuous presidential recount in 2000, John Roberts flew to Florida and volunteered advice to Gov. Jeb Bush, whose brother was trying to clinch the election.
--source

Letter Of The Day

A June 30 editorial said President Bush's "bigger task is to convince the Iraqi people to fight for his vision of their future."

Years ago, we couldn't figure out why the South Vietnamese couldn't be trained to defend their own country. The North Vietnamese had no difficulty defending their country. Same people. One group fought to the death, one did not.

Now in Iraq the government-sponsored armies and police forces are unable to defend their country. They are ineffective.

Meanwhile, the insurgents are very effective, tenacious fighters. Same people, one group fights to the death, one group does not.

Why? We asked the South Vietnamese to die for our goals, our vision of what their country should be like. It didn't work.

Today we are asking the Iraqi army and police forces to fight and die for President Bush's vision, his goals, his agenda. It isn't working. It never has, and it never will.

-Barbara Paulding, Russell.

--attribution

Wednesday, July 20, 2005

they succeeded in washing rove off our televisions

i just wonder how much it cost them.

for all three networks to not even mention rove, given the heavy sunday carryover, it's simply amazing how they all bowed to bush and didn't mention rove all night.

mediawhores. every last one of them. and that includes you john roberts.

Sunday, July 17, 2005

looks like bush is CREATING more terrorists

WASHINGTON - New investigations by the Saudi Arabian government and an Israeli think tank — both of which painstakingly analyzed the backgrounds and motivations of hundreds of foreigners entering Iraq to fight the United States — have found that the vast majority of them are not former terrorists and became radicalized by the war.

--source