the case of the missing money. would it be possible to keep the B.F.E.E. out of it?

jus bouncing around and lookie wat i found. someone trying to do the 'real clear politics' faux nazinewz trip. take a peek at the arrogance, and igorance this poopyhead displays with such style.

(the poop) Forgive me if I fail to believe that police wouldn't take action against a Catholic priest (or any other religious leader) who openly espoused killing people - especially those of another faith - and had a known history of supporting terrorist organizations and terrorist activity.

she goes to link her 'espoused killing people' to the story on the uk site, but not a word about 'espoused' or 'killing people' .. zip, nothing. this is the poop that seems to gain its credibility from where is impossible to guess, other than to venture saying whoever is responsible for spreading this shit around town needs some serious charmin.

people often ask me why i think americans are hated around the world the way they are. this 'why do they hate us?' whine the poopyheads like to toss out everytime they have to defend their fuhrer. but ya know what i tell them? if you watched faux news wouldnt you?

all reality shows all the time. hm. does that mean we're going to have state sponsored television? because, all this 'reality' crap is fine, and i enjoy some of it. but gimme a break. who do they think they're foolin. there's a stage, there's a cameraman taking orders from a director. its not 'real'. it may be competitive. and i think that's what we need to call these shows. competitive tv. not reality tv. i guess it jus sounds better.

so it's gonna be another month before the forces are even ready? ok, that puts it towards march now. any takers on what day in march? email me with your pick, and we'll get a pool going. so much for not 'cooperating with the U.N. by letting the inspectors have more time' huh. ok, time for plan b folx.

ok, slate time

An unnamed administration official says the evidence against Iraq is "akin to an impressionist painting," based on hundreds or thousands of tiny clues.

think that would work in a court of law for possessing a joint?

i got faux news on, and i thought i was watching the 700 club. its really getting syrupy. dripping with hypocrisy and hate and 'the little people' mentality. its amazing that these people have jobs, much less in the broadcast industry. *shiver*

well, another day, i wish another dollar. waiting now for slate, and then i'll head on over to bushwatch cuz yahoo mail is just lame lame lame. hotmail screws with my cpu too much to be comfortable. maybe i should seek out another freebie-public addy. i'm really excited about how the DAILY HOWLER digs into the psyche of the poopyhead. i'm amazed he's not one of their alumni who finally saw the light. i really pity those poopyheads. how they can live with themselves day after day with that attitude that they're the only ones who count. who matter. who 'pays taxes'. jeeezuz, are we still that neanderthal?

when the midget pounded his fist announcing to the rest of the world - you know he wuznt talkin to americans - that you're either with us, or against us. what other possible adjective could you give that, except arrogant. bellicose wallowing is so yesterday. so last century actually. is one of the problems with the poopy-cocktail-crowd is that they're stuck in this timewarp or something? sure we want our country to be the leader it used to be. duh. but that doesnt mean we have to repeat slavery values to do it.

the point being. where the hell are the aliens at god dammit.

NEW GRAPHIC UP @ FARPOINT

from today's guardian. gotta wonder ... all these internet sex stings. what the hell is up with that? are they getting better at grabbing people? or are they just releasing information about those they grab, when its convenient for them? i dont know. underage sex is a bad thing in my eyes. wrong as wrong can be. but to come out with something now about something that happened a long time ago - and yes, more than a year, can be a 'long time'. well, it reeks of poopy. duznt it?

Scott Ritter, the former UN weapons inspector and an outspoken critic of war in Iraq, yesterday claimed he was the victim of a smear campaign after it emerged that he had been arrested in an internet sex sting in June 2001.

Details of the arrest emerged in a local New York state newspaper last week. Reports said Mr Ritter, 44, had been charged with attempted child endangerment after arranging, in an online chatroom, to meet what he thought was a 16-year-old girlat a Burger King restaurant. The girl turned out to be an undercover policewoman. The case was later dismissed.

Mr Ritter cancelled a trip to Baghdad on Tuesday and has instead been appearing on talk shows to defend his reputation. In an interview with CNN on Wednesday he refused to discuss details of the arrest and attempted to shift the fo cus on to who leaked the story. "The case was dismissed. The file was sealed ... Why did this come up now?" he said.

i say follow the money. money trails have a funny way of telling the truth. the truth about why. the truth about who. the plain unabridged truth. the people in power are in power for one reason. they have more money than those not in power. i spoze that's the way it's supposed to be. but does that make it right? money & power form the core of the republikan initiative. poopyheads are who spend money to maintain the power it takes to make more money to have more power. its a vicious circle. being that, it shouldn't be that hard to trace the money then, right?

the problem is, those in power, with the money, have control over something else. information. information, unlike money, has a funny way of disguising the truth. 'oh i read it on the net, so it must be true'. one of the more infamous lines of our time. yet, when anybody tries to prove themselves, what do they turn to? the internet. it is the internet, in all its color, that gives not the truth, but the tools to discern the truth. for the truth comes from within. influenced by home, family, politics, money & information. but there can only be one truth in the same way there is only one 'money' - be it a franc, a dollar, or a pound of gold.

now, lets take this a step further. being rich usually conjures up visions of sugarplums and dollar signs. rolls royces and mansions by the bay. being powerful usually conjures up visions of senior politician types, or men with gold badges or lots of stripes. being powerful and rich on the otherhand, is missing that vision. maybe because one generally spars with the other for dominance. can one be rich without being powerful? and vice versa? some would argue that one can be rich without having a lot of money. of course, that's true. rich doesn't necessarily mean having a lot of money. but when we're talking politics and poopyheads, rich means having a lot of money.

ok, here we go, its a friday. the administration has a penchant for doin crazy shit under the radar on fridays. so lets see what it'll be today.

notice all this iraqi crap talk again. hell, its been like this cat & mouse game for weeks now. since a month before elections anyway. what puzzles me, why didn't any of this get brought up in june? or july? what prompted this administration to make a 'case against iraq' a month before elections?

also, they talk about iraqi cooperation. the us says saddam's not. blix says he needs to do more. saddam, of course, proves it with the facts. he has allowed un inspectors inside iraq. he has allowed un inspectors inside his palaces. he has allowed scientists to be interviewed. he has allowed this. he has allowed that. what the hell does it mean to cooperate?

those empty tin cannisters that make short-range conventional missles. 'could be' used for WMD. well, DUH. almost ANYTHING 'could be' used for WMD if enough of it was fashioned right. the point being, where are the WMD the bu$hies like to scream and holler like a spoiled rotten child. my take is that if the US had proof, they would have given it to the inspectors, so that they could uncover them. that has not happened. we gave them weeks and weeks to uncover the WMD the bu$hiesl say he has. oh wait, is that language now thatl he 'will have'? i mean, shit. how many other 'will haves' are there going to be if we invade?

ok, imus, the grande poopyhead is on. i like listening to this jackass. him and bernard, i swear, make it clear how poopyheads can actually live with themselves. stay tuned. FRIDAY'S SUPRISE is coming.

here's how the game gets played. scare everybody into thinking that destruction of those oil fields would result in $100/barrel prices. then, using that as justification for 'protecting the wells', one could actually make an argument that it should be 'priority number one'. one could also argue that even at $50/barrel, we're getting our money's worth.

but then, you'd have to also consider that protecting those wells, and using the proceeds of those wells (btw, who's doing the buying?) to rebuild iraq, is the only option that should be available. what i have a problem understanding though, is if the money used from the oil in iraq 'could' be used to rebuild iraq, why isn't it being used rebuild iraq now? are they not pumping @ 100% capacity? are the companies that had contracts before all this destruction, still get their contracts honored? by whom?

these are the questions that are evading the american reporters. in fact, i'll bet you all the reporters are playing ignorant and scared that they may lose their 'privileges', because i certainly haven't heard any answers. ideas have been out there for a while. december was when they were supposed to have this 'captured treasure summit', but nary a word from the media about it. why? why is this as much a secret as the energy policy meeting? or bush 41's presidential records? why???

ok, think of it this way. the iraqis could be a boom market to all the oil companies who were meeting to divvy up the treature after the bombs destroy everything else. just so that there can be no backtracking on it, let this quote live in infamy. any bets that it'll come back to haunt them?

The US secretary of state, Colin Powell, told the Boston Globe yesterday: "If there is a conflict with Iraq, the leader ship of the coalition [will] take control of Iraq. The oil of Iraq belongs to the Iraqi people. Whatever form of custodianship there is ... it will be held for and used for the people of Iraq. It will not be exploited for the United States' own purpose."

Asked whether US companies would operate the oilfields, Mr Powell said: "I don't have an answer to that question. If we are the occupying power, it will be held for the benefit of the Iraqi people and it will be operated for the benefit of the Iraqi people."

GUARDIAN 1/23/03

this meeting took place back in december btw.

At the meeting, on the future of a post-Saddam Iraq - details of which have been disclosed to the Guardian - the state department stressed that protection of the oilfields was "issue number one".

issue number one huh. i could see it being number 2, or even 3. but number one??

it's important to remember that there still are good people on this earth. even in des moines. from today's basu column:

On Jan. 9, Maumi Daffay, a refugee from Sierra Leone and the cook at Soul African Cafe on Sixth Avenue in Des Moines, went home to a burglarized north-side apartment. Missing were a TV, household goods, clothes belonging to her and her three children, and irreplaceable African jewelry. Two days earlier, I had run a column on the cafe, and on Jan. 10, Jim Almquist, whose wife read it, went to eat there. He's with the Urbandale Kiwanis Club. Hearing of the burglary, he alerted the Urbandale High School Key Club, which went out and bought Daffay and her family all sorts of things to replace their losses. They'll deliver them later this week. Almquist says they wanted to go beyond the material and show the family moral support.

USAT about the new fed report on economic inequality.

The 10th paragraph of USAT's lead briefly mentions: "Median net worth for whites rose 17 percent to $120,900 but fell 4.5 percent to $17,000 for minorities."

like TP (today's papers) noted. this deserves, if true, a lot more than a mere mention. no wonder nobody's paying attention. WAKE THE FUCK UP PEOPLE... TIME IS RUNNING OUT.

this is unbelievable. could it be the crack in the icepond? i report. you decide.

STRATIAwire by Jon Rappoport

Two weeks before 9/11, all 60 gates at the facility were blocked with concrete barriers and barbed wire. Guard patrols were stepped up.

At least a few soldiers there believe that 9/11 was a military OP carried out by the US government. They also believe that the imminent war on Iraq has the clandestine purpose of enlarging the borders of Israel.

where's the conspirators when ya need 'em.

"A senior Republican senator yesterday expressed concern that a Pentagon surveillance program could be used on U.S. citizens and may "have a chilling effect on civil liberties." In a letter to Attorney General John D. Ashcroft, Sen. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa) alleged that the Justice Department and FBI are more extensively exploring the use of the Total Information Awareness program than they have previously acknowledged.
Washington Post

i'm on grassley's mailing list, and i've generally had a high regard for him. proves my point ... just because you are republican, doesn't make you a poopyhead.

seems like nobody really likes sharpton. i dont either. not because of the same reasons everybody else uses - the tawana thing. but because he just doesn't appeal to me as being a leader i could trust. oh well. HOWARD DEAN HOWARD DEAN HOWARD DEAN. there did i say it enough?

and so much for the accounting reform they touted last year. the SEC is set to water down the rules. even this one.

Among the potentially nixed proposals is a plan to bar accountants from auditing the same tax shelters they created.

and of course, TP is right on the money in almost every paragraph, so it's without surprise that another gets posted.

As everybody mentions, the White House released a report detailing "the lies that Iraq has used to promote its propaganda and disinformation." The Washington Post points out that most of the allegations date from 1990 and 1991.

that damn liberal press. always getting in the way with the truth.

today's Quote of the Day is from EVERYWHERE

"This looks like a rerun of a bad movie and I'm not interested in watching it." - George W. Bush, Jr., President of the United States, January 21, 2003

you're right mister. this IZZ a bad movie. how americans are paying dearly for it is beyond comprehension. how do you sleep at night georgie?

that bald headed poopyhead ari is up screaming about how saddam is a threat because he will use his weapons of mass destruction. weapons of mass destruction huh. you mean those empty cannisters are what we're supposed to accept as weapons of mass destruction? this is a con job. spin has reached a new level of hypocrisy with this freek. i should count how many times WMD gets stressed.

done meatpacking. turn on msnbc, and guess what? that chimp's face is on again. screaming and hollering about saddam. but he's right on one thing. this is like a bad movie. and huney, you're the star whether you like it or not. and notice how this 'terrorist' attack in kuwait is making headlines. what the hell do you call an unmanned armed drone shooting a car in a 'neutral' country? this is really making me puke.

i'm still not done packing my meat, but i couldnt wait another second to get my hands on today's bushwatch.and saw the last item on today's long long list of why the people must wake the hell up and stop this madness.

"One of the [new FEMA] handbook's main suggestions...is for people to create disaster supply kits for the home, workplace and vehicle."

poopheads are the type of people who will love ya to death if they got a war they want you to fight, or some dirty work they need taken care of. but they'll hardly look at ya when they go to the opera, or fly off to the islands for dinner.

that came to me while meatpacking. dont know why. but it did.

and now the Quote Of The Day(tm)

DesMoinesRegister.com | Opinion

Let me get this straight: If you are fired, this is downsizing, budget restraint or some other excuse, unless you are black, and then it is racism.
This constant drumroll of racism really hurts those who are true victims of racism.
The Rev. Robert Price,
Prairie City.

this should make every red-blooded American hang their flags upside down.
DesMoinesRegister.com | Opinion

The administration's violations include withdrawing from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty; undermining the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty; proposing to use smaller nuclear weapons for offensive battlefield purposes; halting progress on the START II and III treaties (nuclear-inventory reduction); developing Star Wars ("Missile Defense" in Orwellian double speak) to facilitate its declared intention to dominate the entire globe from space.
Consider also the "unsigning" from the International Criminal Court and a disregard for multilateral approaches and international law.

today's des moines register had an editorial supporting gay rights.

DesMoinesRegister.com | Opinion

there's no reason to think Republicans will negotiate. "I've never been real thrilled about giving special rights to special people," Senate Majority Leader Stewart Iverson of Dows told the Register. Iverson was among 23 Republicans who successfully took Vilsack to court in 2000 to overturn his gay civil-rights executive order regarding non-discrimination in state-government employment.
The reference to'special people" reeks of intolerance. It underscores the fact that gays and lesbians do face discrimination based on who they are. Long-standing social contempt for certain groups can take a long time to fade.

the iowa legislature needs to get off this poopyhead drunk they're on and allow equal rights, not special rights, for ALL people

the commentary. 'my mother used to say'. oh oh. lieberman smiles. perpetual grin huh. touch of good humor is a good thing. wit & humor is a necessary thing for politicians. not the jack hammer. twice asking about how it felt to 'stick republicans' and the 'democrats attacked reagan'. he likes lieberman's smile. do you? i dont. and it has nothing to do with anti-semitism.

wade henderson - who is he?? i wuznt sittin when they bannerd him. but he disagrees with hatch. connecting him to that inflammatory right-wing base. quotas are illegal. at least he's defining the wrong belief in what this case is really about. tryin to force the distinction between quotas and racial preferences. at least he's calm. teacher-like. leadership council on civil rights. there they bannerd him again. i dunno. bob injects inflammatory into his question to him. brings up abortion. but henderson admits it inflammatory. defends it somewhat. had it down. oh well, commentary comin up.

hatch. discrimination. you're joking right? this is the height of hypocrisy to put someone like hatch up there defending discrimination. and who's these new tits belong to? i'm amazed we dont have a huge mural as a backdrop on the set with him. he's stumbling already. hispanic, indian, african american. there are alternatives huh. good shieffer cornerd him on that. top percent of high school plan? c'mon. you're kidding right? how's health care getting into this? and bob interrupts him on this. citing a WP poll?? 94% 86% women/blacks are against affirmative action???? oh god, lemme find this. there he goes. injecting quotas. we're not talkin about quotas sir. tittie talk now 'we would prefer' ? who the hell is 'we' gurl. so now its the dems fault for causing this. bob shuts him down. finally. yuk. where's my scope?

ok, more powell. again, 1441. council has to act. ok. thats good. cant pin down whether to allow more time if they ask on the 25th. once again, we get the poopyhead spin on wmd. it continues to evolve into that one thing. wont admit to offers of 'coup' and shit. exile. saudi's working on that one behind the scenes, or were, until they bombd out. i wont weigh in at this point on what i think. encourage saddam to listen huh. ok mr secretary. now we're on affirmative action. what a crock. i think they not only prove there's a vast right-wing conspiracy, but they overtly think that they can push it upon the rest of us. overstepping. biting off more than you can chew. wadda they say about that? asking a black secretary of this regime about affirmative action, is only getting the spin. diversity ... but not 'underlying issue'. ok, hatch is up. this is poopyhead #2.

first up, the protests. 'what do you say to 'those people'? 1441, if he disarms there will be no war. one last chance. ? wat the hell duz that mean? arent they cooperating?? (shieffer).. more time? (powell) we have to decide if saddam's serious. jabberish mainly. same ol shit. finally... 'what is it that you want him to do mr secretary?'.... again, 1441 for full complete declaration. where are the missing pages mr secretary should be his next question.. but *gasp*, its not. again, on and on about 'full disclosure'. inspectors sneaking around? no issue to smoking gun requirement. full cooperation? i dont get it. the inspectors are spying .. we all know that. arent the bu$hies not happy with that? wats in their pea sized brains?? .. smoking gun now. 'passive cooperation'? oh, there's a difference huh. ... oh now potential weapons are the same as real weapons. jeeezuz, what have we succumbed to?? his hands are busy tho. time is not only running out huney, admit it. it is over. it wuz over before 9/11. wuzznt it. excuse me while i barf.

face the nation. oh goodie. powell. he's going to come out and say we do not need to go back to the un to start dropping bombs.
.

man, just saw cbs sunday morning segment on some sex therapist in china educating the chinese on sex. she's not only 'not making a dime' off her lectures, books and shit, but she's spending money to do it. because life was good to her, she's gotta return the favor. this being posted in the fields because of the size of those galloshes.