BAGHDAD -- "I don't know if I have the moral authority to send troops into combat anymore," a senior American general recently told United Press International.we could have told them years ago: nothing gets done because it's good for the American people, but whether or not this is good for george bush junior. georgie can now say that he's been able to have people bow to him and wait on him hand and foot like the king he thinks he is. when in reality, he's been nothing but a boil on the butt of every American in this country.
He knows what his power means -- that on his word hundreds or thousands of young men would step into danger.
"I'm no longer sure I can look (a soldier or a Marine) in the eye and say: 'This is something worth dying for.'"
He doesn't mean Iraq. There are plenty of bad people here to fight, and plenty of innocents worth protecting.
His moral crisis was that he had been to Washington, D.C.
He had been asked politically loaded questions from both sides of aisle about the war, each questioner seeking ammunition to use for their own political ends.
He was dismayed. And he's not the only one.
"Everything that happens in Iraq is viewed in Washington through a prism of whether it is good for George W. Bush or bad," said a civilian U.S. official, who spoke to UPI on the condition he not be named.
--source
Wednesday, October 05, 2005
and speaking of the fuhrer...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment