Tuesday, September 09, 2003

david yepsen, winner of poopyhead of the year, des moines' head basher of democrats, will regret these words. so help me God.
DesMoinesRegister.com | Opinion: "Those of us who support a vigorous war on terrorism should be intellectually honest enough to tell the American people how we'd pay for it, and the president's speech prompts me to renew my call: Let's enact a temporary income-tax surcharge on all personal and corporate incomes to pay these costs. Call it a 'Freedom Tax.' It would be 1 or 2 percent of our taxable incomes, renewed by Congress and the president each year. It would be clearly identified by a separate line on the tax form"

Monday, September 08, 2003

FUCK YOU DON IMUS. you're a ego maniac poopyhead. cutting off howard dean's response to the lying chimp's conjob he did on the American people last night, was the last straw. YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH. so what do you do? you cut it off. you' just not man enough.

Saturday, September 06, 2003

The study, released by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration on Friday, finds that 19.5 million Americans used illicit drugs in 2002. This works out to 8.3 percent of the population age 12 or older.

Yahoo

Monday, September 01, 2003

[02:58] if i make you hate me, then you're my enemy

Friday, August 29, 2003

lets see how long it'll take before we start getting the whispers
Bush's Media Barbecue: No Grilling (washingtonpost.com): "CRAWFORD, Tex., Aug. 28 -- In the time-honored political tradition of keeping your friends close and your enemies closer, President Bush invited the White House press corps out to his ranch Wednesday night for a poolside barbecue. "
is there anything as hardhitting as this salvo in today's slate, where it couldn't be more true? when the bu$h administration thinks something is "positive", everybody else feels just the opposite?
Nuclear Test-osterone By Emily Biuso: "The latest North Korean brouhaha arose when, during a meeting in Beijing with officials from the U.S. and four other countries, a North Korean delegate announced that Pyongyang had 'no choice but to declare its possession of nuclear weapons' and 'conduct a nuclear weapons test,' according to the WP. While no reporters appear to have been on hand to hear this, they cite unnamed U.S. officials, and the Post says its quotes are from a cable from the U.S. negotiating team. Everyone notes the disconnect between the U.S. official reaction and the apparent shock expressed by other diplomats at the meeting: While a Bush spokeswoman called the talks 'positive,' sources said that delegates present were visibly upset. Pretty much everyone agrees, though, that this will lead nowhere good: The NYT even hypothesizes that a test could lead to the U.S. seeking a U.N. Security Council resolution, which could lead to sanctions, which North Korea would consider an act of war."
some letters today in the des moines register worth mentioning:

Don't trust Ashcroft with our civil liberties
Foreign nationals are immediately affected by the Patriot Act limitations on civil liberties.

If we, like David Yepsen in his Aug. 21 column, "Ashcroft's Defense Is Simple: Patriot Act Works," repeat without question Attorney General John Ashcroft's unsupported claims the act would have prevented Sept. 11, then we will have no standing to complain when, for example, it is our relative who is held secretly and without formal charges.

It is more difficult to police a citizenry that has rights to privacy, assembly, due process, legal representation and free speech. But it wasn't these rights that prevented detection of the terrorists. Lack of resources, poor communication and degradation of investigative agencies under the Clinton administration all contributed to terrorists slipping through the cracks.

I do not ascribe bad intentions to Ashcroft, President Bush or any legislator, but the act was passed in haste in response to an emergency. Now that we have had time to reflect, we need to decide how many liberties we are willing to give up in the name of security and which principles our troops are dying for in Iraq.

Lori Chesser
Des Moines.

*****

I wasn't surprised to see David Yepsen go to bat for John Ashcroft and his liberty-stomping Patriot Act.

Nor was I surprised Yepsen - like many in our sad-excuse for a "free" press - failed to mention the Domestic Security Enhancement Act (aka: Patriot Act II), which is Ashcroft's latest attempt to use the threat of terrorism as an excuse to strip away more of our individual liberties.

I may be one of those "well-meaning" civil libertarians Yepsen brushes aside, but when Ashcroft sent his secret first draft of the act to Capitol Hill, it contained a section he explicitly titled: "Suspension of the Writ of Habeas Corpus."

And this is the guy Yepsen thinks Americans should trust with their precious liberties.

I don't think so.

Steve Hosch
Gilbert.

*****

Attorney General John Ashcroft has been abusing the Patriot Act from day one.

Since its passage, hundreds of non-citizens have been not only detained, but imprisoned for months at a time without access to their lawyers and without knowing the charges against them.

No, the U.S. Department of Justice is not likely to truncate your civil liberties, David Yepsen, but there are thousands of resident non-citizens who are not so lucky. Not only is there potential for abuse, there have been egregious violations of both civil liberties and due process since this law came into effect.

Alex Body
Polk City.

Thursday, August 28, 2003

Voting machine controversy: "Columbus - The head of a company vying to sell voting machines in Ohio told Republicans in a recent fund-raising letter that he is 'committed to helping Ohio deliver its electoral votes to the president next year.'

The Aug. 14 letter from Walden O'Dell, chief executive of Diebold Inc. - who has become active in the re-election effort of President Bush - prompted Democrats this week to question the propriety of allowing O'Dell's company to calculate votes in the 2004 presidential election. "

Wednesday, August 27, 2003

New York Times
WASHINGTON, Aug. 26 — Even if the economy rebounds strongly over the next few years, the federal budget deficit could climb for the rest of the decade if Congress adopts proposals strongly supported by President Bush, the Congressional Budget Office said today.

Offering a sharp contrast to recent projections by the White House, which had said the budget deficit would hit $475 billion next year and decline significantly after that, the Congressional report warns that annual deficits could rise rather than fall.

The nonpartisan office said the deficit would be $480 billion next year but could reach a cumulative total of $5.8 trillion by 2013.

Administration officials quickly dismissed the Congressional projections as too speculative to take seriously, noting that long-term budget projections have been notoriously inaccurate.

[they lied about the deficit, why should we believe them now?]

But the new analysis is nonetheless based on fairly cautious assumptions. It assumes that economic growth will surge next year and remain solid for the rest of the decade. The biggest reason for potentially much higher deficits is the added cost of legislation that both the White House and the Republican majority in Congress support.

Saturday, August 23, 2003

Obituary backs 'removal of Bush'
Woman 'thought he was a liar
'

"She'd always watch CNN, C-SPAN, and you know, she'd just swear at the TV and say 'Oh, Bush, he's such a whistle ass!' She'd just get so mad," Bettilyon said.

wouldn't it be wonderful if every activist brought a whistle to their protest?
no mr. bush, it's not "us versus them".... it's "you versus the us"
so today, 3 british soldiers are killed in basra. hmmm, first they were saddam loyalists. then "they" were ba'athist remnants. THEN "they" became terrorists. what's next? "they" becoming plain iraqi citizens? how long, how many more of our fine men & women in uniform must die and shed their limbs, before this administration admits: "THEY" do not want us in iraq?
i can think of a whole bunch of these "many Americans"
DesMoinesRegister.com | Opinion: "Paying attention to the environment is different. It requires an attention span. It requires people to recognize they are only a blink on the planet's timeline. It requires people to care about what happens beyond the near future - something many Americans have difficulty doing."

Tuesday, August 19, 2003

Bush Revises Views On 'Combat' in Iraq (washingtonpost.com): "'We've got about 10,000 troops there, which is down from, obviously, major combat operations,' he said. 'And they're there to provide security and they're there to provide reconstruction help. But both those functions are being gradually replaced by other troops. Germany, for example, is now providing the troops for ISAF [International Security Assistance Force], which is the security force for Afghanistan, under NATO control. In other words, more and more coalition forces and friends are beginning to carry a lot of the burden in Afghanistan.'
In fact, the 10,000 troops in Afghanistan represent the highest number of U.S. soldiers in the country since the war there began. By the time the Taliban government had been vanquished in December 2001, U.S. troops numbered fewer than 3,000 in Afghanistan. And three months later, in March 2002, when the last major battle against remnants of the Taliban and al Qaeda took place in eastern Afghanistan, about 5,000 U.S. troops were in the country. "

Monday, August 18, 2003

Davis to OK rights for same-sex couples / No position yet from top GOP recall rival: "Gov. Gray Davis pledged Saturday to sign a domestic-partners bill that would give thousands of same-sex couples many of the same rights as married couples -- including community property, child support and access to divorce court -- and would thrust California to the forefront of the national debate over gay rights.
The bill would put registered domestic partners in California on a par with members of civil unions in Vermont, the only other state with a comparable law, "

Sunday, August 17, 2003

it's not the soldiers' bravery in killing the enemy i most admire, but their stamina in holding up in the hell this president sent them to.
DesMoinesRegister.com | OpinionBaghdad, Iraq - You'd think bullets, bombs and mortars would be enough for American soldiers to worry about in this troubled, dangerous nation.

Now comes word that a half-dozen American soldiers, including a 31-year-old Iowan, have died here in the past week because of Iraq's mind-baking 130-degree heat.

I've been in the region a month, and I'm still trying to deal with, even comprehend, life in what simply must be one of the hottest places on Earth.

Here's what it's like:

A can of Coke blew up in the tent I was sleeping in the other evening in Baghdad. Nothing unusual about that when it tops 130 degrees every day - in the shade - and there's not an air conditioner in sight.

You work up a sweat tying your shoes or brushing your teeth. Or doing nothing. You drip even at night, when it gets down to 95 or so, in what's called the cool of the evening.

Your first day in this hideous heat, you learn when to use - and, more importantly, not to use - the porta-potties. Morning or evening is the time to grab the roll of toilet paper and take the walk. Never, if one can persuade one's body to cooperate, make the trip between 10 a.m. and 5 p.m.

Take a seat during the middle of the day, and you burn your bottom, literally, on the plastic seat.

Sorry to be crude, but life gets pretty basic when you're living in a tent up against a heat index of 150 degrees-plus.

Soldiers work through the day in it and, if they get an hour off in the afternoon, collapse on their scorching canvas cots and fall asleep.

They dream of ways for people back home to get an idea what it's like to spend a summer in Iraq.

They suggest turning the oven on low for an hour or so, to maybe 130 degrees. Then stick your head in there for eight or 10 hours. Or park your car outside in the sun when it's 90 degrees and roll up the windows. Wait a while, then go sit in there for eight hours with the heater turned on full blast. And throw sand in your face, to get the effect of the occasional sandstorm.

Or find the biggest, baddest, hottest blow dryer in the house, turn it on high, and hold it to your face all day. This last one came to me while I was riding in the back seat of a Humvee. No doors. Sixty-five miles an hour. One hundred thirty-five degrees.

It took a couple of nights to figure out a sleeping trick. You're lying on top of your sleeping bag and end up in a puddle of sweat. So you cool yourself by raising your body off the cot, then lying back down in the sweat. It works for a minute or so. Trust me.

My Mennen Speed Stick deodorant has turned the consistency of cake frosting. It's a dip-the-fingers-and-moosh application. Want peanut butter on a cracker? It pours like molasses.

I put a little bottled drinking water in a cup the other afternoon, sat it in the sun for a few minutes and made hot tea.

Your body craves water - you can't drink too much - and a gallon a day isn't nearly enough. But you get tired of water, so you mix up powdered Gatorade or Kool-Aid and enjoy a warm summer drink.

Sometimes you can find ice, but you have to be careful. If it's out of the Tigris or Euphrates you're looking at some very serious health problems, like dropping dead from the crud.

If somebody scores a bag of clean ice cubes - it actually happened one day last week - well, you'd think they were handing out hundred-dollar bills.

Soldiers walked into the tent one at a time with their little cups, each waiting for a turn at three or four cubes.

A 58-year-old master sergeant, savoring the moment, sat down with his cup and watched the ice melt. Then he sucked on a piece and spit it back in the cup and watched til it was gone. He said it reminded him of sitting on his deck at home.

I understood perfectly, and I've only been here a few weeks.

You can't let your bare skin touch anything metal during the day. For soldiers that would mean, oh, weapons, for instance, which they are required to carry everywhere they go. They tape up their helmet snaps to keep the metal from burning their faces.

Forget saving an orange from breakfast for a snack later. Unless you like baked orange. There's no place to keep it cool.

Last Sunday in Baghdad may have been the worst. The temperature was said to be well over 140 degrees.

I lucked out and was invited into an air-conditioned office downtown to relax for a few minutes that day. It was the first real air-conditioning I'd felt in more than two weeks, and it was glorious for about 10 minutes.

Then I had to get back outside, into the heat. I couldn't stand the cold. I was shivering. The thermometer said it was 78 degrees in the room. A young American soldier returned from a week of emergency leave in Illinois and talked about home, where the temperature was in the upper 80s.

"I had to wear a jacket," she said. "I froze. I couldn't get used to 80- or 90-degree weather there."

Others repeated similar stories.

Good Lord, I thought. My body is actually adjusting to this. My insides expect to be cooked every day.

Soldiers tell stories of dizziness and of passing out face-down into their baked beans in the dining hall.

Medics at one unit report treating a dozen cases of kidney stones a day. It's because of dehydration.

An MP told me nine soldiers in his unit provided escort duty for a convoy driving from central Iraq to Kuwait, about 400 miles. Every minute of it was in long sleeves, long pants, helmet and flak vest - probably 20 pounds of gear - mandatory for every soldier who travels through Iraq. Every one of the nine MPs had to receive intravenous fluids by the time they got to Kuwait.

On Saturday, the day before I thought the pavement would melt in Baghdad, an American soldier died because of the heat. Overall, Pfc. David Kirchoff of Anamosa and five other soldiers have died.

I've sweated through it a few weeks. Soldiers have dealt with the heat all summer and will until it lets up in the next month - meaning when it gets back to a more bearable 115 degrees.

They make jokes or try to ignore it.

Like the Army major I had dinner with the other night, who nodded as I moaned about a couple of blisters I got on my arm when I leaned on the hood of a Humvee.

"Right," he said, sweat dripping off his nose into his roast beef, potatoes and gravy.

"It's pretty bad. Could be worse, though. We could be in the jungle. Talk about hot."

Saturday, August 16, 2003

DesMoinesRegister.com | Opinion: "State officials said this week Iowa's unemployment rate jumped to 4.6 percent in July, the highest it's been in 11 years. It's even worse than that, because those who stop looking for work or take part-time jobs are no longer counted. In Iowa, there's a mix of problems: A loss of manufacturing jobs in the smaller towns, where an entire population relied on one employer; and larger cities attracting applicants from everywhere, making the competition tougher for the locals."

Friday, August 15, 2003

Troops in Iraq face pay cut / Pentagon says tough duty bonuses are budget-buster: "Washington -- The Pentagon wants to cut the pay of its 148,000 U.S. troops in Iraq, who are already contending with guerrilla-style attacks, homesickness and 120- degree-plus heat.
Unless Congress and President Bush take quick action when Congress returns after Labor Day, the uniformed Americans in Iraq and the 9,000 in Afghanistan will lose a pay increase approved last April of $75 a month in 'imminent danger pay' and $150 a month in 'family separation allowances.'
The Defense Department supports the cuts, saying its budget can't sustain the higher payments amid a host of other priorities. But the proposed cuts have stirred anger among military families and veterans' groups and even prompted an editorial attack in the Army Times, a weekly newspaper for military personnel and their families that is seldom so outspoken.
Congress made the April pay increases retroactive to Oct. 1, 2002, but they are set to expire when the federal fiscal year ends Sept. 30 unless Congress votes to keep them as part of its annual defense appropriations legislation."
MWO: "Over the years, we at MWO have noticed a poverty of the public vocabulary when it comes to describing Republicans. The reasons for this are many.

But to help correct the situation, MWO hereby provides a list of synonyms for the G.O.P., along with words that aptly describe Republican policies. Speechwriters as well as commentators should feel free to download and borrow from this list freely, at every opportunity."
interns say the darndest things
SLATE Today's Papers: "TP is somewhat upset that no papers went for a cheap comparison and pointed out that yesterday, as usual, there were big blackouts throughout ... Iraq.
How did the first major blackout in the Big Apple since 1977 hurt the media? For one thing, the cadre of regular TP writers in New York were unable to go online and view, well, Today's Papers. The WP Style section takes a wider perspective and notes that the New York Times printing plant in Queens lost power, Fox News only had enough generator fuel to last until 6 A.M., and the Cleveland Plain-Dealer had to temporarily move staff 30 miles to a rival newspaper in order to print today's issue. However, one hard-working New York Newsday reporter was unfazed: after the lights went out, he 'kept interviewing, 'in semi-darkness,' for 20 more minutes, even shooing away another reporter who tried to interrupt to talk about, um, the blackout!'
Avi Zenilman is a Slate intern."

Thursday, August 14, 2003

EAST COAST POWER OUTTAGE... breaking on all networks. if it gets dark and the situation is the same, oh boy.
the effects of the $600 billion being used to pay for this 'war'.
DesMoinesRegister.com | Opinion: "Gesme said a $16 billion cut will mean a reduction in the quality of care. He cited a survey of 1,000 oncologists in which 53 percent said they would limit their treatment of Medicare patients and 19 percent said they would stop treating Medicare patients altogether if the cut is realized.
A $16 billion cut would be one-third of the total Medicare expenditures for cancer care. Gesme points out that the cut divided by the 4,500 oncologists in the United States would mean an average cut to each doctor of $3.5 million over 10 years."
what government needs to do is get rid of the way legislators are seated. republicans and democrats should be all mixed, by state. not this republican-democrat thing any more. especially now with this uber-clique mindset that has taken over this country. a uniter and not a divider? ya, right.

Wednesday, August 13, 2003

in the bizzaro world of bu$h, when war is peace & good is evil, the one sane thing about it remains: how right is so wrong.
hypocrisy in action
Pickering a Fight - Republicans celebrate a judge who's easy on black drug offenders. By Emily Bazelon: "If you like farce, the upcoming judicial confirmation hearing for Judge Charles W. Pickering should make for some satisfying C-SPAN. The Mississippi federal judge is the Bush administration's nominee to the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals*. To defend him against charges of racial insensitivity, Republicans are marketing Pickering's record of giving lenient sentences to black drug offenders. It's nice to see conservative lawmakers deferring to a judge's belief that some criminals deserve a second chance. Except these are the same lawmakers who spent their last term chipping away at the power of federal judges to reduce criminal sentences."
DesMoinesRegister.com | Opinion: "Baghdad, Iraq - The Iraqi leaned close and, in a gesture of sincerity and friendship, touched me on the hand as he spoke.
'Saddam Hussein was a good president,' the man said. 'Under Saddam, I had freedom. Now it's fear.'"

Tuesday, August 12, 2003

DEAN WATCH is starting to take shape.

Monday, August 11, 2003

the ultimate hypocisy
Fox Sues Humorist Al Franken Over 'fair and Balanced' Slogan - from Tampa Bay Online: "NEW YORK (AP) - Fox News Channel has sued liberal humorist Al Franken and the Penguin Group to stop them from using the phrase 'fair and balanced' in the title of his upcoming book.
Filed Monday in Manhattan, the trademark infringement lawsuit seeks a court order forcing Penguin to rename the book, 'Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them: A Fair and Balanced Look at the Right.' It also asks for unspecified damages. "

Sunday, August 10, 2003

from void, on the recall in california. could this really be the ticket to ride? it would be so hilariously funny that all these people spent all that money .... i would die. anyway, we'll see:
gov . gray davis ' poll numbers will look so pitiful right
before the recall election that he will resign before
voters kick him out, explaining it's all for the good of
the state (and the democratic party).

lt. gov cruz bustamonte thus legally succeeds davis as
governor; upon petition, the california supreme court
cancels the election as unneeded and no longer required,
and the feds refuse to hear an appeal (no jurisdiction).

the answer to the problem of money in politics? make all contributions anonymous
Conservatives: The New Stalinists - A new study proves it. By Timothy Noah: "When the Brock piece came out, Chatterbox (then writing a media column for U.S. News) interviewed the conservative commentator David Frum about its thesis. Frum basically agreed with it. 'What happens with the liberal press is that there are loyalties to causes,' he said. That's correct. In Tomasky's study, the Times editorial page supported Clinton on policy matters 52 percent of the time, a mere 7 percentage points less than the Journal supported Bush. But, Frum added, '[w]ith conservatives, I suspect there is much more of a loyalty to people.' And how: The Journal supported Bush on non-policy matters 95 percent of the time, whereas the Times supported Clinton on non-policy matters only 28 percent of the time. Raines' anti-Clinton pathology may exaggerate this last statistic, but there's no denying that compared to liberal editorialists, the conservatives march in lock step. You tell me who produces better journalism."
this should be required reading for every American
Point by Point, a Look Back at a 'thick' File, a Fateful Six Months Later The Most Detailed U.S. Case for Invading Iraq Was Laid - from Tampa Bay Online: SATELLITE PHOTOS

Powell presented satellite photos of industrial buildings, bunkers and trucks, and suggested they showed Iraqis surreptitiously moving prohibited missiles and chemical and biological weapons to hide them. At two sites, he said trucks were "decontamination vehicles" associated with chemical weapons.

---

But these and other sites had undergone 500 inspections in recent months. Chief U.N. inspector Hans Blix, a day earlier, had said his well-equipped experts had found no contraband in their inspections and no sign that items had been moved. Nothing has been reported found since.

Addressing the Security Council a week after Powell, Blix used one photo scenario as an example and said it could be showing routine as easily as illicit activity. Journalists visiting photographed sites hours after the Powell speech found similar activity to be routine.

Norwegian inspector Jorn Siljeholm told AP on March 19 that "decontamination vehicles" U.N. teams were led to by U.S. information invariably turned out to be simple water or fire trucks. On June 24, Blix said of the entire Powell photo package, "We were not impressed with that particular evidence."

Amid Powell's warnings, a critical fact was lost: Iraq's military industries were to have remained under strict, on-site U.N. monitoring for years to come, guarding against the rebuilding of weapons programs.

AUDIOTAPES

Powell played three audiotapes of men speaking in Arabic of a mysterious "modified vehicle," "forbidden ammo" and "the expression 'nerve agents'" - tapes said to be intercepts of Iraqi army officers discussing concealment.

---

Two of the brief, anonymous tapes, otherwise not authenticated, provided little context for judging their meaning. It couldn't be known whether the mystery vehicle, however modified, was even banned. A listener could only speculate over the cryptic mention of "nerve agents." The third tape, meanwhile, seemed natural, an order to inspect scrap areas for "forbidden ammo." The Iraqis had just told U.N. inspectors they would search ammunition dumps for stray, empty chemical warheads left over from years earlier. They later turned four over to inspectors.

Powell's rendition of the third conversation made it more incriminating, by saying an officer ordered that the area be "cleared out." The voice on the tape didn't say that, but only that the area be "inspected," according to the official U.S. translation.

HIDDEN DOCUMENTS

Powell said "classified" documents found at a nuclear scientist's Baghdad home were "dramatic confirmation" of intelligence saying prohibited items were concealed this way.

---

U.N. nuclear inspectors later said the documents were old and "irrelevant" - some administrative material, some from a failed and well-known uranium-enrichment program of the 1980s.

DESERT WEAPONS

According to Powell, unidentified sources said the Iraqis dispersed rocket launchers and warheads holding biological weapons to the western desert, hiding them in palm groves and moving them every one to four weeks.

---

Nothing has been reported found, after months of searching by U.S. and Australian troops in the near-empty desert. Al-Saadi suggested the story of palm groves and weekly-to-monthly movement was lifted whole from an Iraqi general's written account of hiding missiles in the 1991 war.

U-2s, SCIENTISTS

Powell said Iraq was violating a U.N. resolution by rejecting U-2 reconnaissance flights and barring private interviews with scientists. He suggested only fear of the Saddam Hussein regime kept scientists from exposing secret weapons programs.

---

On Feb. 17, U-2 flights began. By early March, 12 scientists had submitted to private interviews. In postwar interviews, with Saddam no longer in power, no Iraqi scientist is known to have confirmed any revived weapons program.

ANTHRAX

Powell noted Iraq had declared it produced 8,500 liters of the biological agent anthrax before 1991, but U.N. inspectors estimated it could have made up to 25,000 liters. None has been "verifiably accounted for," he said.

---

No anthrax has been reported found. The Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), in a confidential report last September, recently disclosed, said that although it believed Iraq had biological weapons, it didn't know their nature, amounts or condition. Three weeks before the invasion, an Iraqi report of scientific soil sampling supported the regime's contention that it had destroyed its anthrax stocks at a known site, the U.N. inspection agency said May 30. Iraq also presented a list of witnesses to verify amounts, the agency said. It was too late for inspectors to interview them; the war soon began.

BIOWEAPONS TRAILERS

Powell said defectors had told of "biological weapons factories" on trucks and in train cars. He displayed artists' conceptions of such vehicles.

---

After the invasion, U.S. authorities said they found two such truck trailers in Iraq, and the CIA said it concluded they were part of a bioweapons production line. But no trace of biological agents was found on them, Iraqis said the equipment made hydrogen for weather balloons, and State Department intelligence balked at the CIA's conclusion. The British defense minister, Geoffrey Hoon, has said the vehicles aren't a "smoking gun."

The trailers have not been submitted to U.N. inspection for verification. No "bioweapons railcars" have been reported found.

UNMANNED AIRCRAFT

Powell showed video of an Iraqi F-1 Mirage jet spraying "simulated anthrax." He said four such spray tanks were unaccounted for, and Iraq was building small unmanned aircraft "well suited for dispensing chemical and biological weapons."

---

According to U.N. inspectors' reports, the video predated the 1991 Gulf War, when the Mirage was said to have been destroyed, and three of the four spray tanks were destroyed in the 1990s.

No small drones or other planes with chemical-biological capability have been reported found in Iraq since the invasion. Iraq also gave inspectors details on its drone program, but the U.S. bombing intervened before U.N. teams could follow up.

'FOUR TONS' OF VX

Powell said Iraq produced four tons of the nerve agent VX. "A single drop of VX on the skin will kill in minutes. Four tons," he said.

---

Powell didn't note that most of that four tons was destroyed in the 1990s under U.N. supervision. Before the invasion, the Iraqis made a "considerable effort" to prove they had destroyed the rest, doing chemical analysis of the ground where inspectors confirmed VX had been dumped, the U.N. inspection agency reported May 30.

Experts at Britain's International Institute of Strategic Studies said any pre-1991 VX most likely would have degraded anyway. No VX has been reported found since the invasion.

'EMBEDDED' CAPABILITY

"We know that Iraq has embedded key portions of its illicit chemical weapons infrastructure within its legitimate civilian industry," Powell said.

---

No "chemical weapons infrastructure" has been reported found. The newly disclosed DIA report of last September said there was "no reliable information" on "where Iraq has - or will - establish its chemical warfare agent-production facilities."

Many countries' civilian chemical industries are capable of making weapons agents, and Iraq's was under close U.N. oversight. The DIA report suggested international inspections, swept aside by the U.S. invasion six months later, would be able to keep Iraq from rebuilding a chemical weapons program.

'500 TONS' OF CHEMICAL AGENT

"Our conservative estimate is that Iraq today has a stockpile of between 100 and 500 tons of chemical weapons agent," Powell said.

---

Powell gave no basis for the assertion, and no such agents have been reported found. An unclassified CIA report last October made a similar assertion without citing concrete evidence, saying only that Iraq "probably" concealed precursor chemicals to make such weapons. The DIA reported confidentially last September there "is no reliable information on whether Iraq is producing and stockpiling chemical weapons."

CHEMICAL WARHEADS

Powell said 122-mm chemical warheads found by U.N. inspectors in January might be the "tip of an iceberg."

---

The warheads were empty, a fact Powell didn't note. Blix said on June 16 the dozen stray rocket warheads, never uncrated, were apparently "debris from the past," the 1980s. No others have been reported found since the invasion.

DEPLOYED WEAPONS

"Saddam Hussein has chemical weapons. ... And we have sources who tell us that he recently has authorized his field commanders to use them," Powell said.

---

No such weapons were used and none was reported found after the U.S. and allied military units overran Iraqi field commands and ammunition dumps. Even before Powell spoke, U.N. inspectors had found no such weapons at Iraqi military bases.

REVIVED NUCLEAR PROGRAM

"We have no indication that Saddam Hussein has ever abandoned his nuclear weapons program," Powell said.

---

Chief U.N. nuclear inspector Mohamed ElBaradei told the council two weeks before the U.S. invasion, "We have to date found no evidence or plausible indication of the revival of a nuclear weapons program in Iraq." On July 24, Foreign Minister Ana Palacio of Spain, a U.S. ally on Iraq, said there were "no evidences, no proof" of a nuclear bomb program before the war. No such evidence has been reported found since the invasion.

ALUMINUM TUBES

Powell said "most United States experts" believe aluminum tubes sought by Iraq were intended for use as centrifuge cylinders for enriching uranium for nuclear bombs.

---

Energy Department experts and Powell's own State Department intelligence bureau had already dissented from this CIA view, and on March 7 the U.N. nuclear agency's ElBaradei said his experts found convincing documentation - and no contrary evidence - that Iraq was using the tubes to make artillery rockets. Powell's scenario was "highly unlikely," he said. No centrifuge program has been reported found.

MAGNETS

Powell said "intelligence from multiple sources" reported Iraq was trying to buy magnets and a production line for magnets of "the same weight" as those used in uranium centrifuges.

---

The U.N. nuclear agency traced a dozen types of imported magnets to their Iraqi end users, and none was usable for centrifuges, ElBaradei told the council March 7. "Weight is not enough; you don't have a centrifuge magnet because it's 20 grams," ElBaradei deputy Jacques Baute told AP on July 11. No centrifuge program has been found.

SCUDS, NEW MISSILES

Powell said "intelligence sources" indicate Iraq had a secret force of up to a few dozen prohibited Scud-type missiles. He said it also had a program to build newer, 600-mile-range missiles, and had put a roof over a test facility to block the view of spy satellites.

---

No Scud-type missiles have been reported found. In the 1990s, U.N. inspectors had reported accounting for all but two of these missiles. No program for long-range missiles has been uncovered. Powell didn't note that U.N. teams were repeatedly inspecting missile facilities, including looking under that roof, and reporting no Iraqi violations of U.N. resolutions.

"There are many smoking guns," the secretary of state said in a CBS interview later that Wednesday in February. "Leaving Saddam Hussein in possession of weapons of mass destruction for a few more months or years is not an option."

The U.S. bombing began 43 days later, and on April 12 al-Saadi, the science adviser, handed himself over to the U.S. troops who seized Baghdad. His wife has not seen him since.

heard on CNN just now, why we shouldn't put marines on the ground in liberia: "we shouldn't be using our marines to alleviate human suffering".... why didn't the anchor come back with 'wasn't it the human sufferage in iraq the reason the president sent in troops?'.... actually, i know why the anchor didn't ask that. it would have produced a response that would have shut her up.
once again, iowans speak out, and speak with some sense.
DesMoinesRegister.com | Opinion: "Marriage first came about as property agreements and safeguards of wealth. Women and girls were sold and bartered into marriage. Sometimes children were betrothed as babies. Wives and children were considered men's properties. This is still true in some societies today. In our own society, most women continue to take their husband's name to show to whom they belong. Pre-nuptial agreements and divorce settlements are important to many. Marriage is not and never has been necessary for propagation of humans or any other beings."

Saturday, August 09, 2003

America's Glossy Envoy (washingtonpost.com): "Hi is a new magazine funded by the State Department, published in Arabic, targeted at Arabs ages 18 to 35 and sold on newsstands in more than a dozen countries. It costs consumers about $2 a copy. It will cost American taxpayers about $4 million a year -- minus whatever advertising revenues it can generate. "

Friday, August 08, 2003

could the answer to the audit trail for electronic voting machines be so simple as to have dual voting tabulators receiving the vote? hell for that matter, have 5 tabulators, just for integrity's sake. mail out codes, let people vote on those codes, and then send the votes to the tabulators, who then will tabulate, and then, and i'm sure this would be pretty good gauge of how secure each vote is registered, and compare results. should there be a discrepancy, either retabulate, or take the averages.

is there anything wrong with this picture? it even could address the internet-voting concerns.
one just has to ask: what was a humvee doing at an upscale shopping mall, empty?
Iraqi Update:: "Shortly after the car bombing, unidentified attackers blew up an unoccupied U.S. military Humvee parked in a well-to-do shopping district. In the two-hour firefight that followed, at least two Americans were injured and the house in which the militants sought refuge was destroyed. "
on the california recall: much ado about arnold. he's got that aryan charm that's for sure. why else would there be so much ink and cameratime devoted to him. sure the recall itself is noteworthy, even newsworthy. but this isnt just news. its entertainment of the highest order. the ultimate reality show. anwyay...

as i was about to say .. the problem with all of these candidates is that they have yet been able to propose a solution. much like how they bash democrats all the time for not having 'a better idea'. HYPOCRISY IN ACTION... btw, that thread in ITN is sure growing.

Tuesday, August 05, 2003

once again, a letter writer to the register makes a point that's worth noticing.
DesMoinesRegister.com | Opinion: "Brewer is either arrogant or naive to make such a blanket statement. Take any poor person who is doing whatever it is that is making him poor and give him whatever it is the rich are doing that continues to make them rich - minus a few advantages such as food, nice clothing, decent shelter, a college education, a job that pays more than minimum wage, inheritances, investments, property, health and dental care, connections in all the right places, tax breaks and show them how to become rich with whatever remains."

Monday, August 04, 2003

it's not very often when you come face to face with someone and your jaw drops while you try your best to mutter: are you for REAL?

furkn irc. ben disconnectin a whole lot lately. dont know whats up with that.
IT'S TRUE: REPUBLICANS ARE PARANOID SCHIZOPHRENIC SISSIES! who else would be threatened everytime they turn around? they're scared of homosexuality. they're scared of phantom weapons. they're always complaining about the threats from things that 'might' happen. this was the same group that was threatened by women in power. threatened by blacks in power. and then to top it all off, they actually believe God speaks to them on why they're threatened. if that's not downright dillusional, i don't know what is. the kicker of this is that they're supposedly the 'party more trusted with national security' in the polls.

just goes to show, that sick people need other sick people in order to mask their disease.

Sunday, August 03, 2003

i think basu never understood that she hit the nail on the head with this paragraph from her column this morning. there was a time when republicans were 'good' people. why do i believe that she never realized that? because she fails to answer the question: why? what happened? wait, maybe she did, and still not realize it.
first the question:
DesMoinesRegister.com | Opinion: "There was a time when the conservatism that's associated with being a Republican was primarily fiscal. There were the Bob Ray Republicans who were pro-immigrant, and the Mary Louise Smith Republicans who were feminist, and those who reached out across the partisan divide to support such things as an equal-rights amendment or even affirmative action. These days they'd have their credentials yanked or become so marginalized they couldn't raise any money."

ayup, right there: "the mayor's race in Des Moines is nonpartisan"

Friday, August 01, 2003

a good observation on how poopyheads work
DesMoinesRegister.com | Opinion: "'It's like the domestic-violence process. If the dependency switch has been turned on, the will is overborne by coercive forces.'"
got the feelin that we're not getting a clear picture of the big story?
DesMoinesRegister.com | Opinion: "The trucks moved toward the border, passing signs that ordered them to not throw food or water to begging children. After crossing the border into Iraq, the trucks passed roadside concrete picnic tables and children, standing barefoot in the blowing sandstorm on the scalding pavement smiling and waving. Then guardsmen saw the children making scooping motions toward their mouths.
Tossing food, though, 'would just bring more kids out and it's very dangerous for everybody when that happens,' said Moore.
The roadside picnic tables are nice. The people just don't have anything to eat"

Thursday, July 31, 2003

this is kinda strange. with cheney 'reiterating' the pre-emptive strikes, while wolfy 'reiterates' using murky intel, and topping off the circus is the monkey himself with that "incoherent" news conference yesterday. what a joke. this cabal has gone collectively insane.
U.S. secretly negotiating with Iran
July 31 — The Bush administration is engaged in a secret dialogue with Iran to try to persuade Iran to hand over top al-Qaida operatives, U.S. officials told NBC News.

THE THREE OPERATIVES are among the most wanted members of al-Qaida:

Abu Mussab al Zarqawi, an alleged poison expert who got medical treatment in Iraq.

Sa’ad Bin Laden, Osama bin Laden’s third-oldest son who is believed to be planning new al-Qaida operations.

Suleiman Abu Ghaith, the al-Qaida spokesman famous for introducing bin Laden in a widely seen videotape after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the United States.

Many U.S. officials believe that Iran is willing to turn them and other key al-Qaida operatives over to the United States or their home countries for a price: in exchange for members of an Iranian opposition group called the Mujahadeen al-Khalq, or MEK.

The MEK has been attacking Iran’s Islamic government from Iraq and is now in Iraq under U.S. military control.

just when you thought it couldnt get any more greedy...
US Dept of State - wf-latest: "President Bush has formally renewed the U.S. sanctions against Iraq, citing continued instability in the country, as well as the need to 'ensure the establishment of a process leading to representative Iraqi self-rule.'
To extend the sanctions, the president certified to Congress that Iraq continues to pose a threat to the United States. Former President George Bush first imposed sanctions on Iraq on August 2, 1990."

Wednesday, July 30, 2003

i just sent paul begala a fireback, and didn't copy that gem. gonna try and type it if they show it at the end of crossfire. about the only cnn program i make it a point to see.
on edit: i think i know what happened. crossfire@cnn is the address they banner. i sent mail via the web to paul specifically. ohwell.
if this isn't the most insane bushism yet, i dont know what is.
Air marshals pulled from key flightsDespite renewed warnings about possible airline hijackings, the Transportation Security Administration has alerted federal air marshals that as of Friday they will no longer be covering cross-country or international flights, MSNBC.com has learned. The decision to drop coverage on flights that many experts consider to be at the highest risk of attack apparently stems from a policy decision to rework schedules so that air marshals don’t have to incur the expense of staying overnight in hotels.

Tuesday, July 29, 2003

msnbc is reporting (on tv) that al-Q is planning another terrorist attack, again using jets. this supposedly is coming from the washington post, which doesn't have anything on the web yet. but one thing that really bothers me: the terror alert level isn't changing. please, dear God, let our defenses and intel agencies have the ability to stop this before it happens.

Monday, July 28, 2003

more from slate:
The LAT plays that angle up, while the NYT emphasizes that U.S. special ops teams looking for Saddam in Baghdad shoot up two cars of civilians yesterday, killing five Iraqis. USAT says that the cars "drove through a roadblock." The LAT says the soldiers fired after they "apparently [became] unnerved" after spotting cars speeding by in a nearby street. The conflicting accounts might stem from the fact that the military has refused to comment, saying that the operation is on-going. The NYT also mentions that troops in Karbala trying to keep an unruly crowd under control, fired into the gathering and killed a cafeteria worker.